HMRC seems to regard directors’ loan accounts (DLAs) as a ‘risk’ area, in which there is the potential for errors. Such is HMRC’s concern that they have produced a ‘Directors’ Loan Account Toolkit’, which provides guidance on the errors that commonly occur. It also includes a checklist to help reduce them (seewww.hmrc.gov.uk/agents/toolkits/dla.pdf).

However,toolkits and checklists only offer general guidance. Practical issues and problems can arise in respect of DLAs for director shareholders of ‘close’ family or ownermanaged companies, three of which are outlined below.

1. ‘Bed and breakfasting’

One of the checklist points in the HMRC toolkit is: “Where an… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : Uncategorized

Anne Fairpo discusses CFC reform and IP

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

CFC reform and IP

In order to reduce the risk of companies diverting profits overseas without good commercial reason, UK companies are subject to tax on the profits of their ‘controlled foreign companies’.  A controlled foreign company (CFC) is one which is resident outside the UK, controlled by persons resident in the UK – the reform of the rules removes the requirement that the company be in a lower tax jurisdiction than the UK, although there is an exemption for CFCs in countries with effective tax rates similar to the UK.

Control

‘Control’ is determined by considering the rights of… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : Uncategorized

It is probably a sign of the present hard economic times that more taxpayers seem to be seeking tax relief for losses on investments in shares and business loans. This is reflected in the number of cases reaching the tax tribunal.

Tax relief claims for losses against capital gains are prevalent. However, such relief generally only shelters gains at rates of up to 28%. By contrast, loss relief against income potentially provides income tax relief at rates of up to 50%, and is therefore the preferred route for many individuals.

The provisions allowing individuals to claim relief for losses on… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : Uncategorized

Private residence relief

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

The Capital Gains Tax (CGT) relief on disposal of an individual’s only or main residence is very valuable and well known. Taxpayers are generally aware of the need to reside in the property, which is a fundamental requirement for principal private residence (PPR) relief. However, what degree of permanence and continuity is necessary to qualify for PPR?

In Clarke v CRC [2011] UKFTT 619 (TC), HMRC raised assessments on the taxpayer, on the basis that he was not entitled to PPR relief in respect of two properties. Prior to purchasing those properties, he lived at the matrimonial home with his… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : Uncategorized

HMRC: Time to Pay

Tuesday, February 28th, 2012

Most tax professionals and many taxpayers will be familiar with the concept of ‘time to pay’ (TTP) arrangements with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). The basic position of HMRC is that tax is payable when due by law (note – the tax legislation does allow certain tax liabilities to be paid by instalments, but such instances are relatively uncommon). However, HMRC has some discretion (under a general responsibility of collection and management of taxes etc in the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005) to allow payment after the due date, in the form of TTP arrangements.

 

HMRC issued… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : Uncategorized

HMRC Enquiries

Tuesday, February 28th, 2012

Most tax agents involved with enquiry work will be familiar with the HMRC practice of ‘spreading’. This generally occurs when there is an agreed addition to the taxpayer’s income for the year of enquiry. HMRC will often seek to assess similar additions in earlier years, and sometimes to agree additions for later years as well. This is on the basis of a ‘presumption of continuity’, i.e. that the taxpayer’s default for the year of enquiry was continued in other tax years as well, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

 

HMRC points to case law in support of ‘spreading’… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : HMRC

Loan relationships – When is a loan not a loan?

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

The loan relationships provisions for companies have been around since 1996, and it is fair to say that the legislation overall is complex. However, it is not normally difficult to identify a loan relationship for these purposes, although a recent case indicates that even this task may not be without its problems. The loan relationship legislation in FA 1996 was rewritten and is now contained in CTA 2009. It states that a company has a ‘loan relationship’ for corporation tax purposes if it is either a debtor or a creditor in respect of a money debt, and the debt arises… Read more…

Comments (1)
Categories : Uncategorized

Married couples (and civil partners) benefit from favourable treatment for certain tax purposes. A common example is the ‘no gain, no loss’ capital gains tax (CGT) treatment for inter-spouse transfers (TCGA 1992, s 58). In addition, the inheritance tax spouse exemption is unlimited for transfers between UK domiciled spouses (although it is restricted to £55,000 if the transferee spouse is non-UK domiciled).

Living together
The principal private residence (PPR) rules for CGT purposes include a provision for married couples. It states that there can only be one sole or main residence for both spouses (or civil partners) so long as… Read more…

Comments (0)

It is straightforward in most cases to establish an individual’s income entitlement for tax purposes. However, there are exceptions. HM Revenue andCustoms (HMRC) recently issued new guidance in its Trusts Settlements and Estates manual on the concepts of ‘resulting trust’ and ‘constructive trust’ for income tax purposes. These are ‘implied trusts’, which are created by operation of law, as opposed to ‘express trusts’ which a settlor normally creates expressly by trust deed.

Resulting trusts
A ‘resulting trust’ is a legal concept. It basically means that property reverts back to the settlor. HMRC guidance provides various examples of a resulting trust,… Read more…

Comments (0)

Penalties and costs – The taxpayer fights back

Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

Taxpayers have recently been successful in a number of appeals before the tax tribunal on the grounds of ‘reasonable excuse’, mainly in respect of late filing penalties. One such case is highlighted below. In addition, the approach of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in a case involving a discovery assessment was criticised by the tribunal, which awarded costs against HMRC. Perhaps a pattern is developing here – the taxpayer strikes back!

In The Executors of David Atkins (deceased) v Revenue and Customs [2011] UKFTT 468 (TC), HMRC had withdrawn a discovery assessment at a very late stage before an appeal… Read more…

Comments (0)
Categories : HMRC